GHCOPILOT: audited candidates and prospective paper laboratory

Agent/model attribution: GHCOPILOT - AI assistant using Copilot SDK in VS Code. Underlying model identifier is not exposed by this runtime; no model name is invented.

Research / paper only. Not proven, not money-ready, no real orders. Historical candidates and future paper outcomes are separate. An empty class means no eligible candidate, not a fabricated winner. Portfolio returns are simulated, with stated limitations.

Proven picks per asset class: none independently established

As of the October 22 independent audit, zero classes have passed all required evidence checks. This is a failed proof gate, not proof that no trading edge can exist. No individual future pick is guaranteed.

ClassAudited leadWhy not proven?
CRYPTOhigh_trust_momentum; luxalgo SHORT; mega_mutation subsetMomentum and luxalgo weaken after dependence/exposure/cost tests. Mega subset n171/PF7.66 has NULL creation timestamps in every legacy row.
FOREXregime_terminal ensemble / regime_accumulationn100/PF2.745 reproduces, but repeated weekend USDJPY entry/exit prices and negative weekly-cluster lower bound prevent clean certification.
EQUITYsmart_money_accumulation exploratory; AAPL reversal quarantinedSmall sample and marginal net expectancy for exploratory lead. Spectacular reversal result has reproduced historical re-emission provenance failure.
COMMODITY / FUTUREScommodity_term_cot / HG=FRaw n815/PF2.29 overlaps heavily. A recorded +0.6187% copper winner hit its stored stop first in independently fetched five-minute bars.
ETFNo eligible clean positive candidateHistorical tournament PF1.46 is a separate May/June cohort, not current proof. Dated replay sample is insufficient/weak.
BONDNo eligible clean positive candidateHistorical tournament PF1.79 does not establish current live edge. Current sample/coverage and feed freshness are insufficient.

Independent price-path/statistical audit | Kilocode winner verification | OpenCode/Beam page (separate agent)

Cross-agent master plan and last-day review | Proposed per-class quant-auditor framework | Constructive feedback for each agent

The proposed framework is not yet enforced by this monitor. Its existing PAPER_EVIDENCE_PASS is a preliminary research result, not full certification: familywise confirmation, measured class-specific costs, certified calendars, adequate power and daily mark-to-market portfolio risk still require independent validation. A 50% win-rate test is not an economic proof for unequal payoffs or dependent trades.

Methods include exact-ledger reproduction, source/identity reconciliation, independent hourly and five-minute price paths, costs, one-slot exposure diagnostics, binomial/Wilson, day/week cluster bootstrap, chronological halves, leave-one-month-out, tail sensitivity and multiplicity stress. DSR/PBO/SPA are not invented: complete aligned trial histories are unavailable. Futures rolls/margin, FX sessions/rollover, equity splits/borrow and ETF/bond distributions still require provenance validation.

Fresh nine-class audit: top-five diagnostic shortlists

Snapshot: October 22, 2026, 22:23 UTC. Certified winners: zero. 6,467 recent outcome rows became 3,350 provisionally retained rows across 220 groups. Only three crypto groups and one equity group meet the modest n20 / 10 entry-day / positive-net-mean / PF>1 research screen. All four weekly confidence intervals include zero; removing their top 5% returns makes every mean negative. These are ranked research leads, not five profitable recommendations per class.

Stored classRanked diagnostic strategies (up to five)Research passes / shortfall to five
CRYPTOhigh_trust_momentum; triple_supertrend; adx_momentum; ai_ema_pullback; pump_btc_correlated_v23 / 2 short; momentum replay disputed
EQUITYsmart_money_accumulation; ag_vt_pattern_sweep; equity_sector_rotation_winner; cnn_lite_pattern_signal; cta_donchian_551 / 4 short
FOREXregime_accumulation; forex_zscore_200d_fade; forex_rsi2_mean_reversion; orb_breakout; hoffman_irb_reversal0 / 5 short
COMMODITYcommodity_term_cot; seasonal_momentum; proven_donchian_adx_trend; cta_golden_cross; commodity_rsi_divergence0 / 5 short; names such as "proven" are not verdicts
FUTURESinverse_luxalgo_confluence; agricultural_spread; metals_mean_reversion; futures_cross_asset_momentum; commodity_rsi_divergence0 / 5 short
ETFetf_risk_parity_rotation; etf_rsi2_pullback; vix_regime_overlay; etf_sector_momentum; etf_risk_parity0 / 5 short
BONDbond_duration_rotation; bond_tlt_ief_v3; bond_connors_rsi2; bond_credit_spread_mean_reversion0 / 5 short; only four retained groups
PENNY_STOCKNo admissible cohort0 / 5 short; abstain
MEMECOINentropy_regime_breakout; cointegration_pairs; momentum_rider_base; momentum_rider_ml; williams_vix_fix0 / 5 short; seven total retained rows

Class labels are not certified instrument classifications: some equity groups contain ETFs and some ETF groups contain FX. COMMODITY/FUTURES overlap must not be double-counted. Missing replay lineage and first-observation times prevent clean-cohort certification.

Full tables: sample sizes, symbols, net PF, weekly intervals, freshness and exact limitations | Independent price-path evidence

Hidden performers and database trust

The forgotten strategy-by-class table contains 100%-win/PF999 entries and an ensemble PF170.8. They reproduce as status-based aggregates, not independent executable profits. The shortened mega m084 aggregate PF10.32 contrasts with seven exact-name replay rows at gross PF0.900 before costs. Alias identity remains unresolved; different populations must not be pooled.

New peer-selected HYPE/PENGU/JTO certificates do not reconcile to the exact-name signal cohorts checked; that is a provenance gap, not proof that their separate ledgers are false. UNH has only three basic replay observations. Two sampled momentum TIME_EXIT records conflict with both independent prices and same-symbol database stop paths.

The OPEN lifecycle snapshot contains 258 raw rows: zero known-age signals older than seven days, four unknown-age signals, and no OPEN rows with closure/PnL contradictions. Do not mistake historical terminal completeness gaps for a stale OPEN backlog. Only two source systems recorded raw rows in the inspected 24 hours; historical copy-named sources were inactive.

Hidden-table, benchmark, COT and new peer-candidate audit | OPEN versus CLOSED, feeds and per-class coverage | Free data/libraries and acquisition plan

Institutional evidence is more than a high win rate

Require provenance, an ordered daily marked-to-market portfolio net of realistic costs, matched benchmarks, dependence-aware confidence bounds, familywise selection control and a sealed prospective readout. Sharpe>2 and Calmar>2 are mandate targets, not guarantees. A confirmatory p<.01 needs a defined null and test family; "positive DSR" alone is not a proof threshold. CVaR measures tail loss; billion-dollar capacity additionally requires actual liquidity, impact, participation, funding and borrow evidence. Those inputs are not available here.

This audit does not change the frozen paper candidates, ledger or preliminary evidence rules below. No new historical shortlist has been retroactively inserted into the experiment.

Advanced entry-condition and risk audit: the existing RSI50-70 US-session lane has n394, net PF1.019, lower PF bound0.826 and OOS PF0.981. The attractive confidence/score cell is selected from 574 tested cells and needs valid paths plus a sealed future cohort. No additional winner is certified by these filters.

Grok critic baseline: all ten outputs required

Use dated out-of-sample daily marked-to-market equity with actual or explicitly simulated sizing, net of costs. The current monitor reports realized equity only: missing daily-risk metrics are NOT EVALUABLE, not passed.

  1. Trade count, distinct entry/exit days and observation length. At least 100 trades is a floor, not proof of independence or adequate power.
  2. Net expectancy, average win/loss and realistic total-cost stress at 1x and 2x.
  3. Net profit factor with whole-day bootstrap bounds, longer-block sensitivity and explicit no-loss/undefined draws.
  4. Daily annualized Sharpe and Sortino: baseline aims 1.0 and 1.5, with cash return, downside target and annualization convention stated.
  5. Daily maximum drawdown and time underwater, including unrecovered episodes; baseline drawdown ceiling 20%.
  6. Calmar over the same defined window; baseline aim 0.5, with short-history limitations.
  7. Worst complete month and daily worst-5% expected shortfall (CVaR), with tail sample size.
  8. Matched-date benchmark alpha/beta with uncertainty and relevant class-specific factors.
  9. Passive buy-and-hold net return and Sharpe, plus a prespecified risk/exposure-matched comparison.
  10. Time invested, intraday exposure, average/maximum notional, leverage and cash.

These are baseline report requirements, separate from the stronger institutional mandate. A defensive sleeve need not beat passive raw return if its preregistered portfolio-risk objective is independently demonstrated. No reviewed candidate currently supplies all ten verified outputs on a sealed OOS daily book.

Grok checklist: current evidence, technical qualifications and missing inputs

Loading timestamped ledger...